Retail · Excel
Reconciling three customer count methodologies for an investor-facing summary
Independent grading: 95/100(verify, opens in a new tab)
Problem
Chidi Okafor at Meridian Retail (simulated retailer) needed to explain to investors why three internal teams reported different customer counts. Marketing, operations, and finance each applied a different definition of 'customer', and the task was to replicate all three counting methodologies in Excel so the discrepancies could be explained clearly.
What I did
Each count maps to a different business rule, so I used a separate formula for each in a new sheet called Customer Count Validation. COUNTA on the customer_id column captures marketing's total of all signups with no filtering. For operations, COUNTIF on the is_duplicate column checks for the text string 'FALSE' rather than a boolean, which is the safer pattern when working with database exports. COUNTIFS then adds a second condition on total_orders greater than zero to arrive at finance's active customer figure. All three count cells carry the #,##0 number format so the table reads cleanly in a presentation context.
Finding
Marketing counted 2,331 total signups; operations counted 2,131 after removing 200 flagged duplicates; finance counted 2,105 active customers, a further 26 non-duplicate accounts that had registered but never placed an order.
Outcome
Chidi received a single summary table with live formulas and explanatory labels that pinpoints the source of each gap, giving a clear basis for the investor slide.
Next step
A useful next step would be to break the 26 zero-order non-duplicates down by acquisition channel, to see whether any single channel is driving registrations that never convert.
- COUNTA, COUNTIF, COUNTIFS for multi-condition counting
- PivotTable filter by boolean text field (is_duplicate = FALSE)
- Sheet organisation and label-based summary table layout
- Nigerian Naira number formatting with thousand separators